| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TCP/IP |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public vs. private IP addresses
Subnetting
Subnet Expansion Table |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subnetting, although becoming more common, should be done with careful consideration. Because some of the addresses ranges created by subnetting will start with either all ones or all zeros, you must remember that the first and last network address ranges are unusable for routing purposes. One disadvantage to using a subnet mask other than the default for that IP class is that it adds a layer of complexity to troubleshooting when a workstation or other network device has a communication problem. Normally IP addresses should be as short as possible and with the simplest subnet mask to minimize errors caused by mistyping. In cases where multiple network segments were required at a given location, we used additional address ranges from the third octet part of the IP addressing scheme. Don't subnet unless you have to, and then try to plan for future use as much as possible to avoid problems with having to change the IP configuration at a later time. There's no one right or wrong way to use the IP addresses for a given subnet. We prefer to use .1 of the fourth octet of the address range (that is, 10.10.1.1) to identify the default route to and from a particular segment. Depending on how many devices will be present on a particular subnet, we like to assign addresses to those devices that shouldn't need to change or can't change for some reason. Devices such as network printers or communications gateways usually need to have a fixed address. If a DHCP address release isn't renewed in time and expires, thereby causing a new address to be assigned to the device, the other devices or services talking to the particular device won't understand how to change to the new address. Duplicate DHCP servers
Conclusion
Last Updated: January 2, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||